My Website | My Twitter| My Facebook| My Blog | MyLinks| My Work


Russia Flag


President: Premier Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin

Minister Of Foreign Affairs: Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov

Relevant to Resolution 1

Comments of Information and Press Department of MFA of Russia on Humanitarian Situation in Syria 349-22-02-2012

Moscow is seriously concerned about the reported hard humanitarian situation in Syria. To get a clear and true picture of the current situation in this area, the Russian Federation launched an initiative in the UN Security Council to delegate the UN Secretary-General to send his envoy to Syria in order to contact with all the parties, including the Syrian government, to secure safe transportation of humanitarian aid to citizens. We voice a hope for the global support of our offer. It is necessary to mention that the International Committee of the Red Cross, going alongside with the Russian initiative, also makes some efforts discussing with the Syrians if it is possible to set a daily two-hour armistice. This armistice is meant to be used to provide population of the country with the humanitarian aid. We actively support the ICRC on this point. We once again strongly appeal all the Syrian parties to stop violence. It applies equally to the official government and opposition that has to dissociate itself from the extremists. Such measures aim at contributing to the immediate start of the All-Syrian dialogue as the only way to settle the situation in this country politically and diplomatically. Russia is ready to work extensively to achieve this goal in cooperation with the international partners and the UN.

Statement of A.K. Lukashevich, Official Representative of Russian Foreign Ministry, on Arms Supplies to Syrian Opposition 436-02-03-2012

Recently we are increasingly called to assist the Syrian opposition with arm supplies, particularly by some participants of the so-called "Friends of Syria Group" who met in Tunisia on the 24th of February, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Particularly, A. Al Faisal, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Saudi Arabia, is reported to have called arm supplies to the opposition "an excellent idea". Considering the fact that Al-Qaeda militants have been proved to form part of the illegal armed groups on the territory of Syria and Al-Qaeda is known to have been condemned as a terroristic organization by the UN Security Council, it stands to reason to ask: how such statements of the responsible politicians match with the above-mentioned decisions and international law in general? The more especially as resolutions of the UN Security Council banned all the countries to finance terroristic organization, to provide them with arms and to support them in any other form. In this respect we would like to recollect the statement made by H. Clinton, the US Secretary of State, on the 29th of February during the Congress sessions in USA. She said, "when al-Qaeda Zawahiri is supporting the opposition in Syria, we shall ask ourselves, who we are supporting if we decide to supply arms." We think it is also appropriate to mention that we shall follow the Declaration on measures to eliminate international terrorism approved by the UN General Assembly on the 9th of December 1994: "States, guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and other relevant rules of international law, must refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist acts in territories of other States, or from acquiescing in or encouraging activities within their territories directed towards the commission of such acts". These obligations are especially essential when some TV channels, particularly Al Jazeera gives airtime to extremists that openly call for physical violence against those who don't share their approaches to the Syrian crisis. The Russian party intends to apply to the counter-terrorist organization of the UN with the demand to clarify the intentions of the officials who stand for arms supplies to the armed groups of the Syrian opposition, and legally estimate their intentions in accordance with the UN Security Council's resolution concerning the ban to support Al-Qaeda and bands connected with it.

PRESS RELEASE Telephone Conversation of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Russia and China 412-29-02-2012 On February 29,

S.V. Lavrov, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia, has a telephone conversation with his Chinese colleague Yan Czechi at the initiative of the Chinese side. The heads of foreign ministries discussed the situation in and around Syria in details. They confirmed the common stand of two countries against direct or indirect encouragement from abroad of any conflicting party to reach the goals by force. Moscow and Beijing are consistently speaking in favour of all interested external parties to promote peaceful settlement in Syria by ensuring conditions for extensive inclusive dialogue between the Syrian authorities and all opposition groups. Only such consolidated work may ensure efficiency of the efforts aimed at the soonest cessation of fire, release of the civilians from suffer, and solution of acute humanitarian issues. The parties gave positive assessment to the results of the referendum on the project of the new country constitution conducted in Syria on February 26, having emphasized the necessity of the exact implementation of the temporary schedule of reforms, including holding of parliamentary elections. The ministers expressed themselves in favour of close contacts on the Syrian issue, as well as further coordination of the stands in UN and other international organizations.

Official representative of the MFA of Russia A.K. Lukashevich answers the question of media about the Russian-Syrian relations 432-02-03-2012

Question: How would you comment an assertion of an article published in the latest issue of the Itogi magazine that according to the Soviet-Syrian Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation signed in 1980 "if a third side invades the territory of Syria the Soviet Union will be involved in the events". Does this mean that Russia might render military aid to Damascus?

Answer: The said Treaty remains in force. Another matter is that the Article 6 mentioned literally says the following: "in case of emergence of situations threatening peace and security of one of the Parties or creating a threat to peace or a threat of violation of peace and security in the whole world the High Contracting Parties will immediately contact each other for the purpose of coordination of their positions and cooperation in order to remove a threat emerged and to restore peace". As you see it speaks about the start of a classic mechanism of consultations. This article as well as, by the way, all other paragraphs of this document do not speak about rendering military aid from our side. Russia is not going to do anything of the kind.

On current situation in Syria 01.02.2012 Boris Dolgov, political scientist

The current situation in Syria remains one of the most important components of the Middle Eastern and international policies. Using Syria's domestic crisis and pursuing their own goals NATO's leading states, Israel, Turkey and the monarchies of the Persian Gulf are trying to undermine the Syrian regime. Since the beginning of the crisis in Syria I have made two trips to that country as a member of international delegations in August 2011 and in January 2012. If we watch the dynamics of situation's development over that period on the one hand we can state intensification of terrorist groups in Syria and on the other hand we see a broader people's support of President Bashar Assad and a clear demarcation of political forces' positions. In the last two months Syria has seen a number of terrorist attacks. The terrorist attacked Syrian servicemen and military facilities, law enforcement agencies institutions, blasts on oil pipelines, railroads, murders and taking of hostage among peaceful citizens (In the city of Homs insurgents killed five well known scientists), arson of schools and killing of teachers (since March 2011, 900 schools have been set on fire and 30 teachers have been killed).

Terrorist attacks in Damascus became one of the bloodiest. Two of them were carried out on December 23, 2011 when cars loaded with explosives went off in front of the buildings of state security service killing 44 and injured about 150 people. On January 6, 2012 on a busy street a suicide bomber attack killed 26 and wounded 60. There were officers of the law enforcement agencies among the victims but most of the victims were occasional by-passers. In January 2012, Damascus has a more severe look in comparison with summer of 2011. Security officers check passports on the way to the airport, asking people what country they are from. Entrances of many state institutions are protected with concrete blocks. There are check points with sand bags near the police stations which are protected by soldiers in bullet proof vests. Lifting gates which close entrances to some of the streets are also by guarded by soldiers and young people with machine guns – these are volunteers from pro-governmental youth movements. But everyday life has not drastically changed. There are no servicemen, armed vehicles or document checks in the city. Damascus is still a busy city, with no vacant seats in internet cafes and on weekends streets are crowded with family couples and young people.

After terrorist attacks in Damascus demonstrations with slogans supporting Bashar Assad and condemning terrorists were held everyday. Similar demonstrations were organized in other large cities such as Aleppo, Homs, Hama, Daraa, Deir az Zor. These demonstrations were covered by the Syrian TV. During our stay in Syria we could move around the city freely and speak with people as we liked but we did not see any single anti-governmental rally. Most of the rallies' participants were young people. The most massive rally which gathered tens thousands of people was held on January 1 in the center of Damascus.

At that rally Bashar Assad addressed to the nation starting his speech with the words: "Brothers and sisters!" He was speaking about a thousands year long history, the need to fight terrorism and the support terrorists receive from abroad. Assad's speech was received with real enthusiasm and there were no signs that this reaction had been staged. The whole square (tens thousands of people) shouted a popular slogan "Allah, Syria, Bashar!" ("Allah, Syria va Bashar bas!").

On January 8, in the memory of victims of terrorist attacks in Damascus a commemoration ceremony was held in St. Cross Cathedral in Damascus. The Mufti of Syria Ahmad Badr Al-Din Hassoun, the metropolitan of the Syrian Orthodox Church and the prior of the Catholic monastery spoke at the ceremony. In their speeches they condemned "the killers and those who put weapons in their hands and sent them to Syria". The tragedy of the mufti of Syria, whose son was killed by the members of the Islamist terrorist group after the mufti had refused to act on the side of the foreign opposition, which goal was to overthrow Bashar Assad, is a telling example in itself.

After the adoption of a new law on political parties an active process of their creation has been underway in Syria. Although formally the constitution envisaged a multiparty system and seven parties were represented in the parliament, in compliance with clause 8 the leading role belonged to the ruling Baath party. Currently there is a wide discussion in Syria about this clause. An official with the Syrian Foreign Ministry told us that in the new constitution (on which the national referendum would be held in February), this clause would be abolished if most of the public and political forces spoke for it. In his address to the nation Bashar Assad said that the new constitution would be approved in March 2012. The parliamentary elections are to be held in May-June 2012. Along with the law on political parties new laws on general elections, local administration and mass media were adopted.

In compliance with the new law in December 2011 elections to the local governments were held. But because of the threat of terrorist attacks the turnout was only 42%, which was confirmed by the Baath officials. Nevertheless, the local administrations were elected and began to work. Under the recently adopted law new mass media are being formed in addition to the current 20 TV channels, 15 radio stations and 30 newspapers.

At present there are three main trends in the Syrian patriotic opposition - democratic, liberal and left, which is mainly a communist one.

The Syrian Social Nationalist Party is the most influential party among the democratic forces. It is also the oldest party which was established in 1932. As Iliah Saman, a member of the political bureau of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party said, the party's program is more conservative in comparison with the Baath's program. Nevertheless there are no differences of principle between the two parties. According to him, the policy of the US, France and England is the main destabilizing factor in Syria. He said that those countries were acting in the interests of Israel and had the goal to divide Syria into five state formations on the basis of religious and ethnical differences.

The liberal trend of the opposition is represented by the recently registered secular democratic social movement led by Nabil Feysal, one of the Syrian intellectuals, a writer and a translator. He is an outright opponent of the Islamic fundamentalism, supporter of the liberal democracy. His goal is to turn Syria into "Middle Eastern Denmark".

The National Committee for the Unity of Syrian Communists is the most influential component of the left (communist) trend of the opposition within the country. Recently it has changed its name for the Popular Will Party which is headed by Qadri Jamil, a prominent Syrian economist and the professor at the Damascus University. He is the only representative of the opposition who entered the committee on the design of the new constitution. Jamil believes that the national dialogue and creation of the government of the national unity (which would include representatives of the patriotic opposition) is the only way out of the crisis. At the same time he thinks that it is necessary to remove all the politicians who are not interested in conduction of reforms from the government, to clean up the opposition from destructive factors and to suppress its radical members who tend to use violence.

The coordination committees are also significant political force which has contacts with the Popular Will Party. These committees on the one hand organize demonstrations demanding concrete reforms and better living conditions on the other hand act as self-defense units which armed people protect their districts from attacks of terrorist groups in particular from a so called Liberal Syrian Army. It should be noted that although in the beginning of protests in Syria, part of the population, including intellectuals shared the opposition discontent with the regime and supported demands on democratization now, after intensification of terrorist groups, they tend to support the regime and the reforms proposed by the government.

A telling example of terrorist crimes was the shelling of a quarter in Homs on January 11 which killed eight local residents. Giles Jacquier, a reporter with France-2 TV, became one more victim of the attack. We spoke with Jacquier shortly before his tragic death and he was convinced that people's protests were suppressed by the authoritarian regime in Syria. He was looking for the opposition everywhere trying to make a report. On failing to find it in Damascus he moved with a group of Dutch and Swiss colleagues to Homs. But in Homs he also met people who were supporting Bashar Assad and demanding to protect them from terrorists. A group of local residents and Giles Jacquier who happened to be near came under a grenade thrower fire, which was a common thing in that district.

Commenting the tragic death of the French reporter Mother Agnes Mariam, who is the prior of the St James Catholic Cathedral in Damascus, said that there is no protesting opposition in Syria but only bandits who are killing people. Many people we contacted in Syria including independent foreign reporters told us about the information war against Syria. According to them, Qatari channel Al Jazeera, for example, in order to broadcast a report on mass anti-governmental rallies in Syria made a fake footage with the help of computer editing using dozens of atmosphere players and decoration of Syrian streets, a kind of "Hollywood village".

As for the Syrian opposition abroad, its political part is represented by the Syrian National council with the headquarters in Istanbul. It is headed by Burhan Ghalioun, a Syrian-French political scientist at the Sorbonne University in Paris. It is quite a heterogeneous formation which comprises groups with different goals. They represent the Muslim Brotherhood and other Sunnite organizations, Kurdish separatists, Liberal-Democratic dissidents who usually reside in Europe and in the US. The armed opposition which conducted terrorist attacks in Syria is represented by a number of groups from a military wing of the Muslim Brotherhood to the Libyan radical Islamists and Al Qaeda. According to the information we receive from our Syrian colleagues there are training camps for insurgents in Lebanon and Turkey. The officers of security services of NATO, Turkey and some Arab states are in charge for the training and armament of the insurgents, while the monarchies of the Persian Gulf provide the financing.

The future development of the situation in Syria depends in many ways on the ability of the ruling regime to consolidate public forces and conduct the announced reforms. Other priorities are the liquidation of terrorist groups and stabilization of the domestic situation. In its turn this issue is directly linked to the development of the global policies and will depend on the activities of the leading countries of NATO, Turkey, the Arab League (which sent its monitors to Syria) Russia and China. As for Russia, it firmly declares that repetition of the "Libyan scenario" in Syria is inadmissible.

Free Syria Blog on Russis Support for Syria

Relevant to Resolution 2


Foreign Affairs Ministry

Foreign Policy Concept of Russian Federation

Russian International Journal

Russia in Wikipedia

Russia on Infoplease

Russian Embassy in USA

US State Department on Russia

Russia Today

Pravda (State Controlled News)in English

CIA Handbook on Russia

Abbreviated for this site

Environment - current issues: air pollution from heavy industry, emissions of coal-fired electric plants, and transportation in major cities; industrial, municipal, and agricultural pollution of inland waterways and seacoasts; deforestation; soil erosion; soil contamination from improper application of agricultural chemicals; scattered areas of sometimes intense radioactive contamination; groundwater contamination from toxic waste; urban solid waste management; abandoned stocks of obsolete pesticides Environment - international agreements: party to: Air Pollution, Air Pollution-Nitrogen Oxides, Air Pollution-Sulfur 85, Antarctic-Environmental Protocol, Antarctic-Marine Living Resources, Antarctic Seals, Antarctic Treaty, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Climate Change-Kyoto Protocol, Desertification, Endangered Species, Environmental Modification, Hazardous Wastes, Law of the Sea, Marine Dumping, Ozone Layer Protection, Ship Pollution, Tropical Timber 83, Wetlands, Whaling signed, but not ratified: Air Pollution-Sulfur 94 Geography - note: largest country in the world in terms of area but unfavorably located in relation to major sea lanes of the world; despite its size, much of the country lacks proper soils and climates (either too cold or too dry) for agriculture; Mount El'brus is Europe's tallest peak


Russia Economy - overview: Russia has undergone significant changes since the collapse of the Soviet Union, moving from a globally-isolated, centrally-planned economy to a more market-based and globally-integrated economy. Economic reforms in the 1990s privatized most industry, with notable exceptions in the energy and defense-related sectors. The protection of property rights is still weak and the private sector remains subject to heavy state interference. Russian industry is primarily split between globally-competitive commodity producers - in 2009 Russia was the world's largest exporter of natural gas, the second largest exporter of oil, and the third largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum - and other less competitive heavy industries that remain dependent on the Russian domestic market. This reliance on commodity exports makes Russia vulnerable to boom and bust cycles that follow the highly volatile swings in global commodity prices. The government since 2007 has embarked on an ambitious program to reduce this dependency and build up the country's high technology sectors, but with few results so far. The economy had averaged 7% growth in the decade following the 1998 Russian financial crisis, resulting in a doubling of real disposable incomes and the emergence of a middle class. The Russian economy, however, was one of the hardest hit by the 2008-09 global economic crisis as oil prices plummeted and the foreign credits that Russian banks and firms relied on dried up. The Central Bank of Russia spent one-third of its $600 billion international reserves, the world's third largest, in late 2008 to slow the devaluation of the ruble. The government also devoted $200 billion in a rescue plan to increase liquidity in the banking sector and aid Russian firms unable to roll over large foreign debts coming due. The economic decline bottomed out in mid-2009 and the economy began to grow in the third quarter of 2009. However, a severe drought and fires in central Russia reduced agricultural output, prompting a ban on grain exports for part of the year, and slowed growth in other sectors such as manufacturing and retail trade. High oil prices buoyed Russian growth in 2011 and helped Russia reduce the budget deficit inherited from the lean years of 2008-09. Russia has reduced unemployment since 2009 and has made progress on reducing inflation since 2010. Russia's long-term challenges include a shrinking workforce, a high level of corruption, difficulty in accessing capital for smaller, non-energy companies, and poor infrastructure in need of large investments.